LEGAL GUIDES FOR INVESTORS
If you suffered losses Driven Brands stock, contact Driven Branks stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a Driven Brands class action lawsuit
introduction to the driven brands lawsuit
The Driven Brands lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers of Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DRVN) common stock between October 27, 2021 and August 1, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Captioned Genesee County Employees’ Retirement System v. Driven Brands Holdings Inc., No. 23-cv-00895 (W.D.N.C.), the Driven Brands lawsuit charges Driven Brands and certain of its top current and former executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you suffered losses in Driven Brands stock and wish to serve as lead plaintiff in the Driven Brands lawsuit, or just have questions in general about your rights as a shareholder, please contact Driven Brands Stock Loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles at no charge by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected] or by submitting a contact form.
In this comprehensive guide, we will break down the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) which governs securities class actions such as the Driven Brands lawsuit including the lead plaintiff provisions, the automatic stay of discovery, the heightened pleading standard, and more.
WHAT IS A SECURTIES FRAUD CLASS ACTION SUCH AS THE DRIVEN BRANDS LAWSUIT?
A securities fraud class action refers to a legal action taken by a group of investors who have suffered financial losses as a result of fraudulent activities committed by a company or its executives. This type of lawsuit is typically filed when a company misrepresents or withholds important information from investors, leading to a decline in the value of their investments. The purpose of a securities fraud class action is to seek compensation for the affected investors and hold the company accountable for its fraudulent practices. Securities fraud class actions are governed by the PSLRA.
One notable securities fraud class action lawsuit is the Driven Brands lawsuit. In this case, investors who purchased FMN securities alleged that the company made false and misleading statements and misled investors, and when the truth was ultimately disclosed, they suffered losses from purchasing shares that had been artificially inflated by the false and misleading information.
Securities fraud class actions such as the Driven Brands lawsuit are typically initiated by a lead plaintiff or a group of lead plaintiffs who represent the interests of all the affected investors. The lead plaintiff is often an institutional investor or a large shareholder who has suffered substantial losses and possesses the resources and expertise to effectively pursue the lawsuit on behalf of the class. The lead plaintiff's role is crucial in coordinating with legal counsel, gathering evidence, and making strategic decisions throughout the litigation process.
To proceed with a securities fraud class action, the lead plaintiff must demonstrate that there is a common issue of law or fact among the members of the class and that a class action is the most efficient and appropriate method for resolving their claims. If these requirements are met, the court will certify the lawsuit as a class action, allowing all eligible investors to participate in the litigation and share in any potential recovery.
Once certified, the securities fraud class action typically goes through several stages, including discovery, where both parties exchange relevant documents and information, and motion practice, where each side presents legal arguments to the court. If the case does not settle during these stages, it may proceed to trial, where a jury or judge will determine liability and damages.
In securities fraud class actions, the defendants are usually the company accused of fraud and its executives who were involved in the fraudulent activities. The lead plaintiff seeks damages on behalf of all class members, which may include compensation for their financial losses, interest, attorneys' fees, and other costs incurred throughout the litigation process.
In conclusion, a securities fraud class action like the Driven Brands lawsuit is a legal mechanism used by investors to seek compensation for financial losses resulting from fraudulent activities committed by a company. The Driven Brands lawsuit serves as an example of how investors can hold companies accountable for their alleged misrepresentations and omissions. These lawsuits play an essential role in protecting investor rights and promoting transparency in the financial markets.
WHAT IS THE PSLRA AND HOW DOES IT APPLY TO THE DRIVEN BRANDS LAWSUIT?
The Driven Brands lawsuit is governed by the PSLRA. The PSLRA is a landmark legislation enacted in 1995 and was enacted to purportedly protect investors from baseless lawsuits while still allowing legitimate claims such as the Driven Brands lawsuit to proceed. This act has had a significant impact on the securities litigation landscape, shaping the way class actions are brought and resolved.
One of the key provisions of the PSLRA is the requirement for plaintiffs to provide specific and particularized facts when alleging a misrepresentation or omission in a securities fraud case. Plaintiffs in the Driven Brands lawsuit must state with particularity the facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with fraudulent intent.
Another important aspect of the PSLRA is the provision for a stay of discovery pending the resolution of any motions to dismiss in the Driven Brands lawsuit. This means that defendants have the opportunity to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint before engaging in discovery. Plaintiffs are, in essence, forced to plead evidence. But with corporate fraud as prevalent as ever, plaintiffs, particularly the top firms, can withstand motions to dismiss and seek justice for shareholders.
The PSLRA also requires courts to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsel in securities class actions such as the Driven Brands lawsuit. This ensures that investors with the largest financial stake in the litigation are represented and have control over important decisions, such as settlement negotiations. The lead plaintiff must meet certain criteria, including having made a timely request to be appointed as lead plaintiff and having the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class.
WHAT IS THE LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE IN THE WHAT IS THE LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE IN THE Driven Brands lawsuit?
The lead plaintiff deadline in the Driven Brands lawsuit is fast approaching, and investors who wish to participate in the case must act promptly. A securities class action lawsuit is a legal proceeding in which a group of investors who have suffered financial losses due to alleged fraudulent or misleading activities by a company join forces to seek compensation. In this case, ChargePoint and certain of its executives are accused of making false and misleading statements about its business prospects as well as filing false and misleading financial statements. The lead plaintiff deadline is the date by which an investor must file a motion with the court to be appointed as the lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit.
Within 90 days after the publication of the notice to class members, the court must consider any motions for lead plaintiff and appoint as lead plaintiff the member(s) of the purported plaintiff class that the court determines to be most capable of adequately representing the interests of class members in the Driven Brands lawsuit.
When a securities class action is filed such as the Driven Brands lawsuit the person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing. Anyone who wants to be lead plaintiff on behalf of the class in the Driven Brands lawsuit must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published.
WHAT IS THE APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS UNDER THE PSLRA IN THE Driven Brands lawsuit?
Under the PSLRA, the appointment of lead plaintiffs in securities class action lawsuits is a critical step in the litigation process. One of the key provisions of the PSLRA is the requirement for the court to appoint a lead plaintiff to represent the interests of the class members in the Driven Brands lawsuit. This appointment is made within 90 days of the filing of the Driven Brands lawsuit, and the lead plaintiff is responsible for overseeing the litigation on behalf of all other class members.
The appointment of lead plaintiffs serves several important purposes. First and foremost, it ensures that the interests of the class members in the ChargePoint class action lawsuit are adequately represented in the litigation. By appointing a lead plaintiff who has a financial stake in the outcome of the FMC class action lawsuit, the court can be confident that the litigation will be pursued diligently and in a manner that maximizes recovery for all class members. Additionally, having a lead plaintiff who is actively involved in the Driven Brands lawsuit allows for efficient coordination and communication between class members and their legal counsel.
To be eligible for appointment as a lead plaintiff in the Driven Brands lawsuit an individual or entity must meet certain criteria as outlined in the PSLRA. These criteria include having the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class and being able to adequately represent the class members' interests.
CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS for LEAD PLAINTIFF MOVANTS IN THE driven brands lawsuit
The PSLRA also requires potential lead plaintiffs to submit a certification stating that they are willing to serve as lead plaintiffs and that they will not accept any payment or settlement that is inconsistent with the interests of the class.
Specifically, each plaintiff seeking to become the lead plaintiff must provide a sworn certification that:
In conclusion, the appointment of lead plaintiffs under the PSLRA is a crucial step in securities class action lawsuits such as the Driven Brands lawsuit. It ensures that the interests of class members are adequately represented and allows for efficient coordination and communication between class members and their legal counsel. By setting forth specific criteria for eligibility, the PSLRA aims to select lead plaintiffs who have a financial stake in the outcome of the case and are committed to pursuing maximum recovery for all class members.
THE DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT IS SUBJECT TO AN AUTOMATIC STAY OF DISCOVERY DURING THE PENDENCY OF A MOTION TO DISMISS
Under the PSLRA, discovery will be automatically stayed in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit during the pendency of a motion to dismiss. However, the PSLRA also creates an obligation for the parties to preserve evidence during the automatic stay of discovery. Any party with “actual notice” of the allegations in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit must treat all documents, data (electronically stored information), and tangible objects in its custody or control that are relevant to the allegations as if they were the subject of a continuing request for production of documents from an opposing party under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court may award sanctions if a party willfully fails to comply with this obligation.
There are two exceptions to the PSLRA’s automatic stay of discovery at the pleading stage: Preservation of evidence exception; and the undue prejudice exception.
PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE IN THE driven brands class action lawsuit
The automatic stay of discovery can be lifted to preserve evidence that would otherwise be lost or destroyed. Parties to a litigation such as the Driven Brands class action lawsuit seeking to invoke this exception must identify the specific discovery sought and specify the reasons why the evidence would be lost or destroyed. Courts typically require more than generalizations of fading memories or allegations of possible loss or destruction, and parties must show that the loss of evidence is imminent rather than speculative.
Several courts have allowed a narrow exception to the automatic stay to allow parties to serve preservation subpoenas on nonparties, who are not covered by the statutory preservation obligation, directing them to preserve documents identified in the subpoena.
The automatic stay of discovery may be lifted to avoid undue prejudice to a party, which courts have defined to mean improper or unfair treatment that is less than irreparable harm.
Circumstances in which courts have lifted the automatic stay include where the defendant would be unfairly shielded from liability through the pursuit of its pending action; the plaintiff would be placed at an unfair disadvantage to make informed decisions about litigation and settlement strategy without access to documents that form the core of the proceeding.
THE DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION LAWSUITIS SUBJECT TO A HEIGHTENED PLEADING STANDARD UNDER THE PSLRA
The pleading standard under the PSLRA is a crucial aspect of securities litigation in the United States. One of its key provisions is the heightened pleading standard that plaintiffs must meet in order to proceed with their claims in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit. This standard requires plaintiffs in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit to provide specific facts that give rise to a strong inference of fraudulent intent or misconduct.
Under the PSLRA, plaintiffs in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit will be required to state with particularity both the facts constituting the alleged violation and the facts giving rise to a strong inference of fraudulent intent. This means that general and conclusory allegations are not enough to meet the pleading standard. Instead, plaintiffs in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit must provide specific details about the alleged misstatements or omissions, as well as any other facts that support their claim of fraud.
However, it is important to note that while the PSLRA raises the bar for pleading in securities litigation, it does not make it impossible for plaintiffs to bring valid claims such as in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit. If plaintiffs can provide sufficient specific facts that support a strong inference of fraudulent intent or misconduct, they can still proceed with their case. The PSLRA simply requires plaintiffs to meet a higher threshold than before, ensuring that only serious claims with a solid foundation are allowed to proceed.
In conclusion, the pleading standard under the PSLRA requires plaintiffs to provide specific factual allegations that support a strong inference of fraudulent intent or misconduct. While the PSLRA raises the bar for pleading, it does not make it impossible for valid claims to be brought forward such as those in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit.
IF THE DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION SETTLES, IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE PSLRA
The PSLRA provides several disclosure requirements with respect to any final proposed settlement in a securities class action such the Driven Brands class action lawsuit. These disclosures include:
WILL THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS GET MORE MONEY THAN CLASS MEMBERS IF THE driven brands LAWSUIT SETTLES?
No, but they may be entitled to recover their reasonable expenses incurred with are directly related to representing the class in the Driven Brands lawsuit. Under the PSLRA, a Lead Plaintiff is only entitled to his or her pro rata share of any recovery and does not receive any additional money for serving as a representative party on behalf of the class. However, a court, in its discretion, may approve an award of “reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages)” to a Lead Plaintiff that directly relates to the representation of the class in the Driven Brands lawsuit on behalf of investors who suffered losses in FMC stock.
CAN I BE APPOINTED LEAD PLAINTIFF IN THE driven brands CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT IF I PURCHASED SHARES OUTSIDE OF THE CLASS PERIOD?
No. Even if you suffered losses in Driven Brands stock, if you purchased securities outside of the Class period, you will not be able to participate in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit.
CAN I BE LEAD PLAINTIFF IN THE DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT IF I AM LEAD PLAINTIFF IN ANOTHER CASE?
Yes, unless you have been a lead plaintiff in more than five securities class actions during any three-year period which is expressly prohibited by the securities laws. Otherwise, if you suffered losses in Driven Brands stock, you may move to be appointed lead plaintiff in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit.
CAN THE COURT APPOINT MORE THAN ONE LEAD PLAINTIFF IN THE DRIVEN BRANDS LAWSUIT?
Yes, at its discretion the Court may appoint a person, entity, or group of persons and/or entities as Lead Plaintiffs to oversee the Driven Brands lawsuit.
CAN A NON-U.S. INVESTOR SERVE AS LEAD PLAINTIFF IN THE DRIVEN BRANDS LAWSUIT IF THEY SUFFERED LOSSES IN DRIVEN BRANDS STOCK?
Yes, courts in the U.S. have consistently recognized that non-U.S. investors, many of whom have substantial holdings, are adequate lead plaintiffs and have the same right to move for lead plaintiffs as U.S. investors. Thus, if a non-U.S. investor suffered losses in Driven Brands, they may move the Court to be appointed lead plaintiff in the Driven Brands lawsuit.
WHAT IF I MISS THE LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE IN DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?
If you purchased shares during the class period and suffered losses in suffered losses in Driven Brands stock, then you will automatically be a class member and entitled to share in any potential settlement or recovery. Your ability to be a class member and recover your losses is not dependent on you serving as a lead plaintiff. The sixty-day deadline applies only to those shareholders seeking to be a lead plaintiff in the Driven Brands class action lawsuit.
CONTACT A DRIVEN BRANDS STOCK LOSS LAWYER TODAY IF YOU SUFFERED LOSSES IN DRIVEN BRANDS STOCK ABOUT A DRIVEN BRANDS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
If you suffered losses in Driven Brands stock, contact Driven Brands stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation about a Driven Brands class action lawsuit. Call today and see what a Driven Brands stock loss lawyer could do for you if you suffered losses in Driven Brands stock. The call is free and so is the fee unless we will or settle your case.
Nashville attorney Timothy L. Miles is a nationally recognized shareholder rights attorney raised in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Miles has dedicated his career to representing shareholders, employees, and consumers in complex class-action litigation. Whether serving as lead, co-lead, or liaison counsel, Mr. Miles has helped recover hundreds of millions of dollars for defrauded investors, shaped precedent-setting decisions, and delivered real corporate governance reforms. Judges and peers have repeatedly recognized Mr. Miles relentless advocacy for the underdog, as well as his unbendable ethical standards. Mr. Miles was recently selected by Martindale-Hubbell® and ALM as a 2022 Top Ranked Lawyer, 2022 Top Rated Litigator. and a 2022 Elite Lawyer of the South. Mr. Miles also maintains the AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell®, their highest rating for both legal ability and ethics. Mr. Miles is a member of the prestigious Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers: The National Trial Lawyers Association,Class Action: Class Action: Top National Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers Association (2023), a superb rated attorney by Avvo, a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award by Premier Lawyers of America (2019) and recognized as a Distinguished Lawyer, Recognizing Excellence in Securities Law, by Lawyers of Distinction (2019); a Top Rated Litigator by Martindale-Hubbell® and ALM (2019-2022); Americas Most Honored Lawyers 2020 â€“ Top 1% by America's Most Honored (2020-2022). Mr. Miles has published over sixty articles on various issues of the law, including class actions, whistleblower cases, products liability, civil procedure, derivative actions, corporate takeover litigation, corporate formation, mass torts, dangerous drugs, and more. Please visit our website or call for free anytime.
The Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
300 Centerview Dr., #247
Brentwood, TN 37027
Phone: (855) 846-6529
Email: [email protected]
HOURS OF OPERATION