If you suffered losses in Brainstorm stock, contact Brainstorm stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a Brainstorm class action lawsuit

The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: BCLI) publicly traded securities between August 15, 2022 and September 27, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Captioned Sporn v. Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc., No. 23-cv-09630 (S.D.N.Y.), the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit charges Brainstorm Cell and certain of its top current executive officers with violations of the​ Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
​​
If you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock and wish to serve as lead plaintiff in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit, please contact Brainstorm Cell Stock Loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected] or by submitting a contact form. Lead plaintiff motions for the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit be filed with the court no later than January 2, 2024.

In this comprehensive guide, we will discuss everything a Brainstorm Cell investor needs to know about the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit. 

​Brainstorm Cell is a biotechnology company, which develops and commercializes autologous cellular therapies for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Progressive Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases.

The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Brainstorm Cell downplayed the severity of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) refusal to file letter, and (ii) Brainstorm Cell continued to conceal the risks associated with the submission of its Biologics License Application.

The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit further alleges that on November 10, 2022, Brainstorm Cell issued a press release titled “BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics Receives Refusal to File Letter from FDA for its New Biologics License Application for NurOwn for the treatment of ALS.”  The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit alleges that following this announcement, the price of Brainstorm Cell stock fell more than 42%.

The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit further alleges that on September 27, 2023, Brainstorm Cell announced that members of the FDA’s Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee voted 17 to 1 that there was not substantial evidence to show NurOwn’s effectiveness.  The Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Brainstorm Cell stock fell more than 48%.

​When a securities class action is filed such as the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit, the person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing. Anyone who wants to be lead plaintiff on behalf of the class in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published. 

The acceptance of restitution or compensation from a FINRA regulatory settlement does not waive your right to monetary or other benefits through the courts, arbitration, or mediation. Therefore, even if you received a settlement from FINRA, you can still participate in the Brainstorm Cell lawsuit. 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased and suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. 
​
​A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the securities class action lawsuit.  An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery of the class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. If you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock and have further questions, contact Brainstorm Cell​ stock loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today who will fight to recover your damages in a Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit if you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell​​ stock.

Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit has several advantages and important benefits including:

• A Lead Plaintiff is able to negotiate more competitive attorney fees and reduce other litigation costs by actively monitoring the class counsel.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being able to manage the litigation primarily by overseeing and monitoring the progress of the action and the efforts of counsel, and being able to review and comment on important filings and other documents pertaining to the prosecution of the action.
• There is no financial risk in serving as a Lead Plaintiff because Lead Counsel advances all costs and expenses incurred in the prosecution of the case and will be reimbursed only if there is a successful settlement or judgment recovery on behalf of the class.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being involved and active in all negotiations relating to any settlement.
• Lead Plaintiffs that continue owning the stock of the defendant will enjoy the long-term benefits from governance reform resulting from the litigation. 

Thus, there are numerous benefits and other advantages to serving as lead plaintiff in a class action against Brainstorm Cell if you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell​​ stock. ​

A Lead Plaintiff owes a fiduciary duty to the class, and therefore, must act in the best interest of the class in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit.  Some of the responsibilities of the Lead Plaintiff in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit include:

• Selecting, monitoring, and overseeing Lead Counsel.
• Reviewing and commenting on court filings on behalf of the class.
• Discussing litigation strategies with the Lead Counsel.
• Attending depositions (if necessary) and giving a deposition.
• Attending hearings (if necessary).
• Participating in mediation and the trial (if necessary).
• Provide input on any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class action.

​But they may be entitled to recover their reasonable expenses incurred with are directly related to representing the class in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a Lead Plaintiff is only entitled to his or her pro rata share of any recovery and does not receive any additional money for serving as a representative party on behalf of the class.  However, a court, in its discretion, may approve an award of “reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages)” to a Lead Plaintiff that directly relates to the representation of the class in the Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell​​ stock. 

​At its discretion, the Court may appoint a person, entity, or group of persons and/or entities as Lead Plaintiffs to oversee the Brainstorm Cell​​ lawsuit.

In a securities fraud class action, the class period refers to a period of time in which it is alleged the price of the company’s stock was artificially inflated due to false and misleading statements made by company executives.  The class period starts when the company makes an untrue statement of material fact about the company or fails to disclose a material fact necessary to render other statements not misleading.  The class period ends when the truth is revealed to the investing public through a corrective disclosure.  
 
In order to be a part of the class in the Brainstorm Cell lawsuit, you must have suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock by purchasing during the class period when it is alleged the price of the stock was artificially inflated to be included in the class action against Brainstorm Cell​. ​

A Brainstorm Cell stock loss Lawyer is well-versed in the complex laws that govern the securities industry and litigation and focuses on representing individual investors or funds who have been the victims of fraud or who have disputes with investment professionals such as the class action against Brainstorm Cell. Ordinary individual investors, including civil servants, teachers, nurses, and retirees, may need a securities lawyer. In most cases, they have lost money due to mistakes, incompetence, or fraud by an investment professional.

While FINRA, the SEC, and state securities regulators serve a vital role in protecting investors, they simply have too many individuals, firms, and market transactions to monitor to discover every act of fraud or negligence. Individual investors should consult with a securities lawyer if they have lost money due to fraud or stockbroker misconduct. 

​Look for a securities lawyer with experience, high ethical standards, verifiable credentials, and a trustworthy reputation among his peers and the judiciary, as well as testimonials from previous clients and awards and recognitions.

One name that immediately pops up is nationally known and widely respected Nashville lawyer Timothy L. Miles, who has valuable experience and has received numerous awards, mostly due to his high ethical standards, and hard work ethic, including most recently being named a Top 25 Class action lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers Association, and has maintained an AV rating from Martindale-Hubble since 2014, was named a 2023 Top Rated Litigator and 2023 Top Rated Lawyer by Martindale-Hubble and ALM, and was recently named a 2023 Elite Lawyer of the South by Martindale-Hubble for the fifth year in a row, and was a recipient of Avvo Client’s Choice Award in 2021, in 2022 was featured in the Top 100 Lawyers Magazine and received the Lifetime Achievement Award by Premier Lawyers of America (2019–2021).

​This will most likely be the only call you need to make. (855) 846–6529 or [email protected]. 

​​​In a securities fraud class action lawsuit, the plaintiff’s damages are typically calculated as out-of-pocket losses. These losses are expressed as the difference between the price at which the stock was sold and the price at which the stock would have been sold absent any artificial inflation caused by the defendant’s alleged misrepresentations or omissions which is why you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock. Contact a Brainstorm Cell stock loss lawyer who could explain your losses in greater detail if you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell ​stock. 

If you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell stock, contact Brainstorm Cell stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation about a Brainstorm Cell class action lawsuit. Call today and see what a Brainstorm Cell stock loss lawyer could do for you if you suffered losses in Brainstorm Cell​ stock.

​​This will most likely be the only call you need to make. (855) 846–6529 or [email protected]. 

If you suffered losses in NuScale stock, contact NuScale stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a NuScale class action lawsuit

The NuScale class action lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) securities between March 15, 2023 and November 8, 2023 (the “Class Period”).  Captioned Sigman v. NuScale Power Corporation, No. 23-cv-01689 (D. Or.), the NuScale class action lawsuit charges NuScale and certain of its top current and former executive officers with violations of the​​ Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
​​
If you suffered losses in NuScale stock and wish to serve as lead plaintiff in the NuScale class action lawsuit, please contact NuScale Stock Loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected] or by submitting a contact form. Lead plaintiff motions for the NuScale class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than January 16, 2024.

In this comprehensive guide, we will discuss everything a NuScale investor needs to know about the NuScale class action lawsuit.

NuScale is a nuclear power company that develops small modular reactor technology.
​
The NuScale class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) because of the effect of inflationary pressures on the cost of construction and power, NuScale and the Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (“UAMPS”) would be unable to sign up enough subscribers to fulfill their Carbon Free Power Project (“CFPP”) contract; and (ii) Standard Power did not have the financial ability to support its agreement with NuScale.

The NuScale class action lawsuit further alleges that on October 19, 2023, Iceberg Research issued a research report that contradicted NuScale’s claims that it could fulfill the CFPP contract with UAMPS as well as NuScale’s contract with Standard Power.  The NuScale class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of NuScale stock fell more than 25% over two trading session.

​The NuScale class action lawsuit additionally alleges that on November 8, 2023, NuScale and UAMPS announced that they had mutually agreed to terminate the CFPP contract because they had failed to engage enough subscribers.  The NuScale class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of NuScale stock fell nearly 33%.

​​When a securities class action is filed such as the NuScale class action lawsuit, the person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing. Anyone who wants to be lead plaintiff on behalf of the class in the NuScale class action lawsuit must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published. 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased and suffered losses in NuScale stock to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the NuScale class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. 
​
​A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the securities class action lawsuit.  An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery of the class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. If you suffered losses in NuScale stock and have further questions, contact NuScale​​ stock loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today who will fight to recover your damages in a NuScale class action lawsuit if you suffered losses in NuScale​​ stock.

Courts in the U.S. have consistently recognized that non-U.S. investors, many of whom have substantial holdings, are adequate lead plaintiffs and have the same right to move for lead plaintiffs as U.S. investors.  Thus, if a non-U.S. investor suffered losses in NuScale stock, they may move the Court to be appointed lead plaintiff in the NuScale class action lawsuit.

Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the NuScale class action lawsuit has several advantages and important benefits including:

• A Lead Plaintiff is able to negotiate more competitive attorney fees and reduce other litigation costs by actively monitoring the class counsel.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being able to manage the litigation primarily by overseeing and monitoring the progress of the action and the efforts of counsel, and being able to review and comment on important filings and other documents pertaining to the prosecution of the action.
• There is no financial risk in serving as a Lead Plaintiff because Lead Counsel advances all costs and expenses incurred it the prosecution of the case and will be reimbursed only if there is a successful settlement or judgment recovery on behalf of the class.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being involved and active in all negotiations relating to any settlement.
• Lead Plaintiffs that continue owning the stock of the defendant will enjoy the long-term benefits from governance reform resulting from the litigation. 

Thus, there are numerous benefits and other advantages to serving as lead plaintiff in a class action against NuScale​ if you suffered losses in NuScale stock. ​

​A Lead Plaintiff owes a fiduciary duty to the class, and therefore, must act in the best interest of the class in the NuScale class action lawsuit.  Some of the responsibilities of the Lead Plaintiff in the NuScale class action lawsuit include:

• Selecting, monitoring, and overseeing Lead Counsel.
• Reviewing and commenting on court filings on behalf of the class.
• Discussing litigation strategies with the Lead Counsel.
• Attending depositions (if necessary) and giving a deposition.
• Attending hearings (if necessary).
• Participating in mediation and the trial (if necessary).
• Provide input on any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class actio

​But they may be entitled to recover their reasonable expenses incurred with are directly related to representing the class in the NuScale class action lawsuit. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a Lead Plaintiff is only entitled to his or her pro rata share of any recovery and does not receive any additional money for serving as a representative party on behalf of the class.  However, a court, in its discretion, may approve an award of “reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages)” to a Lead Plaintiff that directly relates to the representation of the class in the NuScale class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who suffered losses in NuScale stock. 

​Yes, at its discretion the Court may appoint a person, entity, or group of persons and/or entities as Lead Plaintiffs to oversee the NuScale​ lawsuit.

In a securities fraud class action, the class period refers to a period of time in which it is alleged the price of the company’s stock was artificially inflated due to false and misleading statements made by company executives.  The class period starts when the company makes an untrue statement of material fact about the company or fails to disclose a material fact necessary to render other statements not misleading.  The class period ends when the truth is revealed to the investing public through a corrective disclosure.  
 
In order to be a part of the class in the NuScale lawsuit, you must have suffered losses in NuScale stock by purchasing during the class period when it is alleged the price of the stock was artificially inflated to be included in the class action against NuScale​​.  

A NuScale stock loss Lawyer is well-versed in the complex laws that govern the securities industry and litigation and focuses on representing individual investors or funds who have been the victims of fraud or who have disputes with investment professionals such as the NuScale class action lawsuit. Ordinary individual investors, including civil servants, teachers, nurses, and retirees, may need a securities lawyer. In most cases, they have lost money due to mistakes, incompetence, or fraud by an investment professional.

While FINRA, the SEC, and state securities regulators serve a vital role in protecting investors, they simply have too many individuals, firms, and market transactions to monitor to discover every act of fraud or negligence. Individual investors should consult with a securities lawyer if they have lost money due to fraud or stockbroker misconduct. 

Look for a securities lawyer with experience, high ethical standards, verifiable credentials, and a trustworthy reputation among his peers and the judiciary, as well as testimonials from previous clients and awards and recognitions.

One name that immediately pops up is nationally known and widely respected Nashville lawyer Timothy L. Miles, who has valuable experience and has received numerous awards, mostly due to his high ethical standards, and hard work ethic, including most recently being named a Top 25 Class action lawyer by the National Trial Lawyers Association, and has maintained an AV rating from Martindale-Hubble since 2014, was named a 2023 Top Rated Litigator and 2023 Top Rated Lawyer by Martindale-Hubble and ALM, and was recently named a 2023 Elite Lawyer of the South by Martindale-Hubble for the fifth year in a row, and was a recipient of Avvo Client’s Choice Award in 2021, in 2022 was featured in the Top 100 Lawyers Magazine and received the Lifetime Achievement Award by Premier Lawyers of America (2019–2021).

​This will most likely be the only call you need to make. (855) 846–6529 or [email protected]. 

​​​In a securities fraud class action lawsuit, the plaintiff’s damages are typically calculated as out-of-pocket losses. These losses are expressed as the difference between the price at which the stock was sold and the price at which the stock would have been sold absent any artificial inflation caused by the defendant’s alleged misrepresentations or omissions which is why you suffered losses in NuScale stock. Contact a NuScale stock loss lawyer who could explain your losses in greater detail if you suffered losses in NuScale stock. 

If you suffered losses in NuScale stock, contact NuScale stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation about an NuScale class action lawsuit. Call today and see what a NuScale stock loss lawyer could do for you if you suffered losses in NuScale stock.

​​This will most likely be the only call you need to make. (855) 846–6529 or [email protected]. 

If you suffered losses in SolarEdge stock, contact SolarEdge stock loss lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a SolarEdge class action lawsuit

​The SolarEdge class action lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers or acquirers of SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SEDG) securities between May 3, 2023 and October 19, 2023, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Captioned Shen v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., No. 23-cv-09748 (S.D.N.Y.), the SolarEdge class action lawsuit charges SolarEdge and certain of its top executive officers with violations of the​​ Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
​​
If you suffered losses in SolarEdge stock and wish to serve as lead plaintiff in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit, please contact SolarEdge Stock Loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at [email protected] or by submitting a contact form. Lead plaintiff motions for the SolarEdge class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than January 2, 2024.

In this comprehensive guide, we will discuss everything a SolarEdge investor needs to know about the SolarEdge class action lawsuit.

SolarEdge provides inverter solutions for a solar photovoltaic (PV) system. 

The SolarEdge class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) SolarEdge’s distribution channels in Europe had higher than optimal inventory levels; (ii) as a result, SolarEdge was experiencing substantial cancellations and pushouts of existing backlog from its European distributors; and (iii) consequently, SolarEdge’s backlog and guidance was overstated.

The SolarEdge class action lawsuit further alleges that on August 1, 2023, SolarEdge CEO, defendant Zvi Lando revealed that “distribution channels in Europe are experiencing higher than optimal inventory levels, especially as it related to solar modules.”  The SolarEdge class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of SolarEdge stock fell more than 18%.
​
The SolarEdge class action lawsuit further alleges that on October 19, 2023, SolarEdge disclosed that “[d]uring the second part of the third quarter of 2023, we experienced substantial unexpected cancellations and pushouts of existing backlog from our European distributors” and “[a]s a result, third quarter revenue, gross margin and operating income will be below the low end of the prior guidance range.”  SolarEdge further revealed that it “anticipates significantly lower revenues in the fourth quarter of 2023 as the inventory destocking process continues,” according to the complaint.  The SolarEdge class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of SolarEdge stock fell more than 27%.

​When a securities class action is filed such as the SolarEdge class action lawsuit, the person who files the first complaint is required to publish a notice announcing the filing. Anyone who wants to be lead plaintiff on behalf of the class in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit must thereafter file a motion to be appointed as lead plaintiff(s) no later than 60 days after the notice was published. 

​​The acceptance of restitution or compensation from a FINRA regulatory settlement does not waive your right to monetary or other benefits through the courts, arbitration, or mediation. Therefore, even if you received a settlement from FINRA, you can still participate in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit. 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased and suffered losses in SolarEdge stock to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. 
​
​A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the securities class action lawsuit.  An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery of the class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. If you suffered losses in SolarEdge stock and have further questions, contact SolarEdge​ stock loss Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today who will fight to recover your damages in a SolarEdge​ lawsuit if you suffered losses in SolarEdge​ stock.

Serving as a Lead Plaintiff in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit has several advantages and important benefits including:

• A Lead Plaintiff is able to negotiate more competitive attorney fees and reduce other litigation costs by actively monitoring the class counsel.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being able to manage the litigation primarily by overseeing and monitoring the progress of the action and the efforts of counsel, and being able to review and comment on important filings and other documents pertaining to the prosecution of the action.
• There is no financial risk in serving as a Lead Plaintiff because Lead Counsel advances all costs and expenses incurred it the prosecution of the case and will be reimbursed only if there is a successful settlement or judgment recovery on behalf of the class.
• Lead Plaintiff has the benefit of being involved and active in all negotiations relating to any settlement.
• Lead Plaintiffs that continue owning the stock of the defendant will enjoy the long-term benefits from governance reform resulting from the litigation. 

Thus, there are numerous benefits and other advantages to serving as lead plaintiff in a class action against SolarEdge​ if you suffered losses in SolarEdge​​ stock. ​

A Lead Plaintiff owes a fiduciary duty to the class, and therefore, must act in the best interest of the class in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit.  Some of the responsibilities of the Lead Plaintiff in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit include:

• Selecting, monitoring, and overseeing Lead Counsel.
• Reviewing and commenting on court filings on behalf of the class.
• Discussing litigation strategies with the Lead Counsel.
• Attending depositions (if necessary) and giving a deposition.
• Attending hearings (if necessary).
• Participating in mediation and the trial (if necessary).
• Provide input on any decision concerning the settlement of the securities class action.

​But they may be entitled to recover their reasonable expenses incurred with are directly related to representing the class in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a Lead Plaintiff is only entitled to his or her pro rata share of any recovery and does not receive any additional money for serving as a representative party on behalf of the class.  However, a court, in its discretion, may approve an award of “reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages)” to a Lead Plaintiff that directly relates to the representation of the class in the SolarEdge class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who suffered losses in SolarEdge​ stock.